February 23, 2024

Is Astrology Science or Quackery?

Astrology is the study of how the positions of celestial bodies might affect human life and nature. It’s been a topic of interest and disagreement for a long time. It has been a subject of fascination and controversy for centuries. I know some people who even resorted to astrology regarding the Super Bowl Odds for the 2024 NFL. They view astrology as a legitimate science with ancient roots and profound insights. But I dismiss it as mere pseudoscience. In this article, we will explore arguments from both sides of the spectrum to gain a comprehensive understanding of whether one should trust astrology.

Where Astrology Came From

Astrology has its roots in ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Egypt, and China. Early stargazers watched the stars and planets and tried to understand what they meant for life on Earth. The idea that where the planets were when you were born could shape your future became popular in many cultures and stuck around for centuries.

What Scientists Say

Despite astrology’s long history and widespread popularity, it has come under intense scrutiny from the scientific community. Critics argue that astrology lacks empirical evidence and fails to meet the criteria of a legitimate science. Skeptics point out that astrological predictions are often vague and open to interpretation.

Furthermore, numerous studies have failed to find a correlation between astrological factors and personality traits. A meta-analysis published in the journal Psychological Reports in 1985 reviewed over forty studies on astrology and found no significant evidence to support its validity. Similarly, a study published in the journal Nature in 1989 examined the relationship between astrological signs and personality traits in over 2,000 individuals and found no proof.

Consider two twins. According to astrology, they should have identical destinies, correct? However, experience demonstrates the opposite: two people born at the same moment may lead entirely different lives. One twin may achieve success while the other may fail.

Moreover, numerous astrological systems are fundamentally opposed to each other. For instance, Western astrologers would interpret a horoscope differently than their Chinese counterparts. Furthermore, there is no unified interpretation among astrologers. Some recognize only 8 zodiac signs instead of the conventional 12, while others acknowledge 14 or even 24. Consequently, a person may visit two astrologers and receive entirely contradictory advice on the same day!

Another thing is that astrology operates on the premise that all planets orbit Earth. This notion was disproven by Copernicus, who demonstrated that planets revolve around the Sun. Since astrology relies on a discredited theory, it cannot be deemed reliable. If the theory is false, that means all predictions must also be false.

But perhaps the primary inconsistency of astrology lies in the number of planets within the solar system. Most astrological charts are predicated on the assumption of only seven planets. In ancient times, Neptune, Uranus, and Pluto were unknown. Consequently, astrologers constructed the entire system based on the seven planets they believed orbited the Earth. However, it has since been proven that the Sun, not the Earth, is the center of our system, and there are, in fact, three additional planets within it.

What Astrology Proponents Say

They argue that skeptics’ dismissal of astrology is based on a narrow definition of science. They contend that astrology operates on a different paradigm than traditional scientific disciplines and should be evaluated using alternative methods. Astrologers often cite anecdotal evidence and personal experiences as proof of astrology’s efficacy.

According to astrologers, the entire surface of our planet constitutes an energy network. The Earth receives energy from other cosmic bodies through the North Pole. The energies of the planets influence the human aura, also known as the astral body (from the Latin ‘astrum,’ meaning star or planet). When a person is in the womb, their astral body is shielded by the maternal aura. At birth, the child’s aura is briefly unprotected and undergoes a significant restructuring. It comes under the influence of signals emitted by planets and stars towards Earth. This impact is imprinted on the aura and subsequently affects the individual’s character.

Ethical Considerations

In addition to scientific concerns, critics of astrology raise ethical issues. They argue that astrology’s reliance on vague and generalized predictions can lead to harmful outcomes.

If, despite everything, a person continues to believe in astrology, this can lead to one or more dangerous consequences:

  • Astrological books and consultations with astrologers are often expensive and may empty your wallet.
  • Astrological advice on spending and investing money is frequently incorrect. That may lead to costly mistakes.
  • Astrology promotes a fatalistic outlook on life, potentially causing deep depression.

Critics also express concern about the potential for astrological advice to influence important life decisions, like relationships, career choices, and financial investments. You can get recommendations based on unfounded or misleading information.

Astrology supporters argue that ethical practitioners talk about free will and empower people during consultations. They believe astrology can help with self-reflection and personal growth if used responsibly.

Final Decision

The debate over whether astrology is science or quackery continues to divide opinions and spark lively discussions among proponents and skeptics. While astrology has ancient roots and remains deeply ingrained in many cultures, its validity as a scientific discipline remains highly contested.

Whether one views astrology as a legitimate science, a form of quackery, or simply an intriguing cultural phenomenon may depend on individual beliefs, experiences, and perspectives. However, you should remember that an astrologer does not provide what an astronomer or any other scientist offers: proof. The vague character analyses astrologers offer cannot be considered evidence. In reality, charts and horoscopes serve as a smokescreen to divert attention from reality. Astrological predictions hold no scientific significance.

About the author 

Kyrie Mattos

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}